Pro-Life or Pro-Choice In the argument of abortion, there are many sides to be seen.
Often, this argument goes hand-in-glove with the argument that if pro-lifers really want to be pro-life, they have to support giving more money to such-and-such a social program, or hand out free condoms, or endorse some other politically-liberal policy.
Other times, the argument is that pro-lifers need to personally adopt kids, or else be content to let them get aborted. Here are seven reasons that argument is as bad as it widespread: Even if the argument were true, it would be ridiculous. Even if the charge that pro-lifers are only focused on birth were true, it would be a ridiculous argument.
Imagine that you saw a woman save a drowning child.
Criticizing her for not doing other good things is absurd. The argument is logically fallacious. Would that make killing an unborn child defensible? The argument is unspeakably melodramatic. Think about what this objection is really saying.
Do you just wish I was dead? Wanting the education of your neighbor is a good thing. So even if it were true that pro-lifers were just apathetic to your quality of life after birth, the argument still would be melodramatic and emotionally manipulative.
The argument is hypocritical. You could find a way to give a few dollars more, even if it means working a bit more or spending less on yourself. Does that mean that you want those poor people to die?
I certainly hope not. The argument is more than a little condescending. The argument is demonstrably false. As I said, even if the arguments about pro-lifers not caring about what happens after birth were true, it would be a bad argument.
If you look at the actual data, a very different story emerges. I know of no comprehensive data comparing the giving rates of pro-lifers v. But we can get some strong clues by looking at Republican v. Democratic giving, and at red state v. But even that assumption was true, the argument would be false.
Of the top seventeen most generous states for charitable contributions, all seventeen of them voted for Romney in the election [while true, this fact is slightly misleading, in that D.
And of the seven least charitable states, all seven of them voted for Obama.
And anyone actually familiar with the pro-life movement already knows this. Pro-lifers are frequently the first to sacrifice personally: So the argument gets it entirely backwards. The real debate is about the means, not the ends.
And today is a celebration of that progress that we have made in this cause. Social Security does a lot of good, but there are legitimate reasons to believe that our spending is unsustainable. Virtually everyone recognizes that healthcare is important, and that there are major flaws in our healthcare system, but most of the proposed solutions are expensive, untested, and complicated.
This is why the quotation from Sr. Chittister above is fatuous:Opponents, identifying themselves as pro-life, contend that individual human life begins at fertilization, and therefore abortion is the immoral killing of an innocent human being.
They say abortion inflicts suffering on the unborn child, and that it is unfair to allow abortion when couples who cannot biologically conceive are waiting to adopt.
Whoopi Goldberg vigorously defended her abortion stance during Thursday's "The View," trying in vain to get conservative panelist Sunny Hostin on Team Pro-Choice.
While promoting the annual March. Pro-life vs. pro-choice is a nasty debate that doesn’t seem to have many answers. There are many questions and facts to back up both.
Pro-Life Citations/Conclusion (Derek): Word Count: Alcorn, Randy. Pro Life Answers to Pro Choice Arguments. , Multnomah Books. Reardon, C. D.
Abortion Risks. F or decades, the never-ending abortion debate has been summarized by the dueling sound bites of pro-choice and leslutinsduphoenix.com slowly, but lately more steadily, the fundamental premise of pro-life advocacy—that abortion not only stills a beating heart, but takes a human life—has resonated with the American public.
Anti-Abortion vs. Pro-Life There is a great deal of debate not only over the subject of abortion, but also the terminology used to discuss the subject. I use the term "anti-abortion", rather than the more generally preferred term "pro-life", to refer to people or positions that oppose abortion, as I do.